Sagadahoc Story #64: 11/3/98

The wind in the trees


The weather turned raw for hunting season, after a dose of mild days and starry nights. The deer shoot started Saturday, Halloween, which has to be one of the stupidest decisions on record. Take every child in the state, put them in masks, get them cranked up on sugar, and send them out along the roads at dusk. Then pour a full tot of good old boys into their pickups and send them out with rifles to chase shadows. Miraculously no kids were reported bagged.


Hunters at Crossing
We drove up to Litchfield Saturday afternoon, and hunting sign was everywhere. Pickups on the shoulders willy nilly. Armed men in blaze orange walking perimeters. Fourwheelers waiting to drag out the carcass. Heightened alertness in the air. Not a deer in sight.
New views are unfolding. The trees have shaken off their solar collectors, and dropped into the sleep mode. The farther hills and hidden valleys of Summer appear between the bare boles, and all the house starts stick out. You have to feel for the folks who went in during high foliage, flattened a houselot, and installed a doublewide in the privacy of the woods, only to discover another new house within sight when the leaves have fallen. The upper end of the Post Road looks like a rolling sea of trailers, now the picture is ungreened. Brent says there's a hundred trailers up the old road. At least we're safe from suburbanization.

It's a commentary on our priorities that all the new low rent dwellings in these boonies are manufactured housing. Brent and Bruce and Dr. Bob are now constructing a small building down on Mere Point, 20X24, two story. What could be a charming starter home (it's actually an outbuilding), with unlimited expansion potential. $30,000. That's as much footage as a trailer, and a whole lot more character. There could be crews of carpenters putting up the rustic cape-and-els of the future, to grace the landscape, instead of tractors hauling in bland ephemera. But we're convinced that a stickbuilt home is beyond modest means, and most carpenters are building mansions on the shore.

As the hidden landscape exposes itself, I'm seeing new things in the renderings, too. I've made a stab at drawing the wind in the trees, and found my paintings opening up, as the woods are. Part of it's a result of using digiOlympus. As the weather's cooled off, I'm more likely to be snatching glimpses with the camera, and then painting from prints. It changes the paintings. Media informing each other, again.
Rolls on the Curve

At first I struggled to get high resolution photos, which ain't easy with a digital camera, even with a 1.4Meg image. At close range in good light these wonder tools grab images that print well up to 8X10, but wide angle landscapes or marginal conditions leave you begging for a chemical SLR. As with all new tools, you try and replicate what the old tools could do, and are disappointed. Then you start exploring the medium, and discover new ways of looking. I was so busy trying to take electronic slides, I hardly noticed that I was making pixilated prints. Or how lush and tactile they can be.

Similarly, I was doing contortions to get big file images of subjects I wanted to paint. I'd go out with the camera set at the low res, shooting at will, until I found a likely image. Then I'd switch to the highest resolution, and try to get the perfect picture. Sometimes I did get a print quality photo, but more often I was disappointed. This camera can only store 4 big shots on it's card. I carry a spare card, but that still limits me to 8 pictures per outing, if I insist on hi res. And the download line is brutal. I can take 98 quickies at the low end. It wasn't until I accepted the limitations of the technology that it started to work for me. I found I could take low res snaps (146K: 640X510 pixels) from a variety of angles, enhance them in the software (Photoshop), print the picture, and have a rough framework to paint from.

I've gotten over the feeling that painting from photos is cheating. I frame the shots to suit the camera, of course, and tend to use the same composition for the drawing. But I can still crop and edit the scene to fit the different medium. The act of translation from eye to hand to eye doesn't change in essence. What does change with using these low res takes, is the density of detail I'm working from. The seen world is infinitely rich at all levels of examination. Extracting a telling semblance from the myriad details is the al fresco fandango. You dance to a different tune with photos. Most of the image in these printed pictures is a graduated pattern of blurs. To accomplish the dense linear mesh that's become my style I have to invent the details. Where I was reducing a seamless manifold to a handful of gestures, now I'm using learned gestures to fill out a vague patterning. The product looks much the same, but the technique is inside out.

The two different approaches enrich one another. Going out to paint teaches me the strokes that capture reality. Going in to paint shows me the elemental structure of the scene, and dissolves the mesh so other fish can swim through. I first saw the effect of this new seeing with the Hobart Farm drawing. The photo was sparse on detail, and I'd built up the line drawings of the trees from an inner memory of maples and oaks. When I washed on the colors, I was unusually light-handed, influence by the thin colors in the print I was looking at. Leaving out all the dense color in a foreground tree caused it to light up, the way the actual tree had been illuminated by its brilliance. KAPOW. When I was done there was hardly any pigment in my water jar.


Firewood Tractor
I've known all along that a masterful watercolorist lets the paper shine through, but damned if I could leave it alone. The world was too thick and thingy to leave the paper blank. By filtering the world with a camera, I'd begun to let a little light into my paintings. Whoda thunk? And if the light can get in, what about the air? I set about finding a view that would mimic the feeling of falling leaves and naked branches sighing. Of course there ought to be some good manjunk in the foreground. In the end I took a picture of a woods tractor in a lot. But the background was of thick woods. So I thinned the trees, and opened out the sky. A wind knocked the leaves loose.


Fall can do that: strip you a little bare so new things show through. A good time to tear it down and move the ingredients around, too. That's what the town's doing. At town meeting we voted to buy the old fertilizer mill on the riverbank to use as a municipal facility, and the Frizzle boys are up to their public works in demolition and cartage. Last Sunday week Doug took his machinery to the backside of the mill and shoveled a hunk of it into a burn pile. Monday the fire department torched it. The remains smoldered until Thursday. Ironically, we used to say that the worst nightmare was having that mill burn, and kill us all with toxic smoke. In the end all we suffered was the stink of cooked asphalt. Now they're trucking the winter sand pile onto the cleared slab. Nice to see our taxdollars moving a pile of dirt that's going to be spread on the roads anyhow.

 

Mill Demolition


Bowdoin Mill (1997)

When the old mill is completely gone there'll be another gaping hole in the center of town. Everyone in eyeshot seems to think that'll be glorious. Clearcut the landing, flatten the old buildings. I must be an oddball to think romantic eyesores and abandoned buildings are more interesting than tidy parking lots. Another crew has started demolishing the big wooden mill buildings at the falls in Brunswick. A project to resurrect the heart of the Bowdoin Mill is finally going to happen, and that 19th century yellow brick landmark is going to be restored, after they bulldoze the surrounding structures. Score one for esthetics.

Next Dispatch Previous Dispatch Dispatch Index Home Index